<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Tennis &#187; VS Nanotube Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionfortennis.com/tag/vs-nanotube-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionfortennis.com</link>
	<description>Feel it. Play it. Share it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:20:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Babolat VS Nanotube Drive</title>
		<link>http://passionfortennis.com/babolat-vs-nanotube-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://passionfortennis.com/babolat-vs-nanotube-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Your Host</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Racquets - Babolat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VS Nanotube Drive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionfortennis.com/2007/03/19/babolat-vs-nanotube-drive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Babolat VS Nanotube Drive &#160; Length: 27.5 in. Weight: 9.3 oz. Ideal Swing &#8211; Short: No Ideal Swing &#8211; Medium: Yes Ideal Swing &#8211; Long: No Maneuverability: Low Control: Low Power: High Comfort: MediumThis is tennis&#8217; version of a rocket launcher. To increase power, Babolat blended ultra-stiff carbon fibers into the throat of the Nanotube [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="padding-bottom:10px;padding-left:6px;padding-right:6px;"><font face="arial" size="4"><b>Babolat VS Nanotube Drive</b></font></td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="padding-left:6px;padding-right:6px;" class="middle_column_content">
<form name="Form1" method="post" action="babolat.aspx?id=56932">
<div></div>
<div><span class="middle_column_content"><b><img src="http://tennis.com/uploadedImages/Your_Game/Gear/Racquets/Babolat/2006_12_20_babolat_vs_nanotube_drive.jpg" alt="Babolat VS Nanotube Drive" align="right" border="0" height="151" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="350" />Length:</b> 27.5 in.<br />
<b>Weight:</b> 9.3 oz.<br />
<b>Ideal Swing &#8211; Short:</b> No<br />
<b>Ideal Swing &#8211; Medium:</b> Yes<br />
<b>Ideal Swing &#8211; Long:</b> No<br />
<b>Maneuverability:</b> Low<br />
<b>Control:</b> Low<br />
<b>Power:</b> High<br />
<b>Comfort:</b> MediumThis is tennis&#8217; version of a rocket launcher. To increase power, Babolat blended ultra-stiff carbon fibers into the throat of the Nanotube Drive frame (so called because of a manufactuaring process that Babolat says utilizes cutting-edge nanotechnology). Add in the oversize head, thick cross section, and head-heavy balance and, well, your opponents better get outta the way. &#8220;This racquet has tons of power,&#8221; said a 3.5 player. &#8220;It felt like I was getting an extra 10 miles per hour on my shots.&#8221; The Nanotube isn&#8217;t particularly maneuverable (testers drew comparisons to a frying pan) and is suited for players with a medium-length swing who can get around on the ball and let the head-heavy balance work in their favor. Short-swinging novices, by contrast, felt the frame was too cumbersome.</p>
<p><b>BOTTOM LINE</b><br />
A game-improvement racquet that&#8217;s ideal for baseliners with medium-length strokes.</p>
<p></span></div>
</form>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://passionfortennis.com/babolat-vs-nanotube-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

